Advocacy and policy news for internists
Medicare Eliminates Consultation Coding for 2010
In a dramatic shift in coding policy, beginning Jan. 1, 2010, Medicare will no longer recognize the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) consultation codes. The 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule that was published at the end of October finalized a proposal to no longer recognize office/outpatient and inpatient consultation codes. Physicians will continue to be paid for providing consultation services, but they will need to adjust their billing to use new codes.
ACP has contacted the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to request that they delay the implementation of these coding changes. The College is also working with our subspecialty advisory group, the Subspecialty Advisory Group on Socioeconomic Affairs, to come up with recommendations to CMS about specific issues that need to be addressed before proceeding with the policy change. Among the most pressing of those issues is the need for CMS to provide basic notice of the new policy to physicians while allowing them adequate time to prepare for the change.
In order to compensate for the elimination of the higher reimbursement paid for consultation codes, CMS is adjusting the payment rates for the evaluation and management codes that are being used in their place. The physician work component of payments for office visit services will be increased by 6 percent, and the physician work component for initial hospital visit services will be increased by 2 percent. CMS estimates that with these changes the financial impact for eliminating the consultation codes will be modest. General internal medicine revenues would increase by 1 percent, while most internal medicine subspecialty revenues would decrease by 1 percent. More information about the financial impact of the changes is included in ACP's summary of changes in the 2010 fee schedule.
While the College is still advocating for a delay in the new policy, with Jan. 1 fast approaching, physicians should begin familiarizing themselves with the upcoming changes. The consultation codes will be replaced with a varying list of office visit and hospital care codes.
- For billing Medicare for office or outpatient consultation services, physicians should generally bill a new patient visit (CPT 99201-99205).
- If the patient has been seen by the consulting physician in the previous three years, the visit should be billed as an established patient visit (CPT 99211-99215).
- Medicare inpatient consultations should be billed with initial hospital care codes (CPT 99221-99223).
- When admitting Medicare patients to hospitals or nursing facilities, the admitting physician should use the initial hospital care CPT codes or initial NF care codes (99304-99306), with the new "-AI" modifier.
- Follow-up telehealth inpatient consultations provided to a patient in the hospital or skilled nursing facility setting should be billed with new HCPCS codes G0406-G0408.
It is important to note that while the consultation codes still appear in the 2010 CPT codebook, they are there for use with insurers other than Medicare. For billing to Medicare, physicians will need to use office/outpatient visit or hospital care codes, instead of the consultation codes.
|WHAT YOU BILLED MEDICARE IN 2009||WHAT YOU'LL BILL MEDICARE IN 2010|
|Office Consultation||New or established patient office visit|
|Inpatient hospital consultation||Initial hospital care|
|Inpatient hospital admission visit|| Initial hospital care, with modifier "-AI"|
|Nursing facility consultation||Initial nursing facility care|
|Nursing facility admission|| Initial nursing facility care, with modifier "-AI"|
|Follow-up telehealth or SNF inpatient consultations||New HCPCS codes G0406 thru G0408|
Additional information about Medicare changes in 2010 can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions about the Medicare 2010 Physician Fee Schedule, on the College's Web site. Also, as the New Year approaches, check the Running a Practice section of the Web site for updates on the consultation coding issue as more guidance from CMS becomes available.
December 10, 2009
|»||Cost-Sharing paper |
“Addressing the Increasing Burden of Health Insurance Cost Sharing,” ACP’s most recent position paper, says cost sharing -- particularly deductibles -- may cause patients to forgo or delay care, including medically necessary services.
ACP says that a different cost-sharing approach is needed to ensure that vulnerable people can afford medically necessary care in the face of rising health coverage costs and stagnant wages.
The five recommendations in the paper address ways that cost sharing can be made more equitable in the private market by reducing overall health care spending, designing insurance plans that allow access to high-value services, enhancing financial subsidies for marketplace-based insurance plans, improving outreach and health insurance literacy and education, and advocating for updated research on the effects of patient cost sharing.
|»||2016 EVP report |
ACP’s 2015-2016 Annual Report of the Executive Vice President is an interactive review of ACP's programs, initiatives, and accomplishments over the past fiscal year. It offers highlights, including information about clinical recommendations and policy papers, the High Value Care initiative, and advocacy efforts to represent member interests and needs.
The report also includes a brief video message from Dr. Weinberger as he prepares to step down as ACP's Executive Vice President and CEO in September.
|»||Notification Procedures for Outpatients Receiving Observation Services |
Enacted Aug. 6, 2015, the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility Act (NOTICE Act) requires hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) to provide notification to individuals receiving observation services as outpatients for more than 24 hours explaining the status of the individual as an outpatient, not an inpatient, and the implications of such status.
The standardized notice, the MOON, is going through the Paperwork Reduction Act process, thus affording the public an opportunity to comment on the MOON. The 30-day public comment period begins when the final rule is published.